Brain Injury Specialist

Return to the Brain Injury Rehabilitation Services Menu

Variables Contributing to Neurological & Neurobehavioral Recovery

Demographic Variables

  1. Age at injury: infants can have developmental problems, young adults recover better that older adults, older adults have more stable lives and develop effective compensatory skills.
  2. Pre-morbid Intelligence and Education Levels: more education may increase connectivity of neural networks, more practice of skills during education may also result in more automatization of cognitive skills.
  3. Gender: most information comes from the stroke population with indication that women recover better, new studies indicate that there some influences come from hormones and hormonal cycling.
  4. Cultural Background: multicultural clients are most likely to end therapy prematurely, language barriers, group identity, beliefs & values influences.
  5. Pre-morbid or Current Drug & Alcohol Abuse: TBI population has a higher rate of drug and alcohol abuse pre-morbidly. Abuse after injury contributes to a poor outcome

Injury Related Variables

  1. Time Since the Injury:
    • The fastest recovery is in early stages, moderate to severe injury is slow but significant for the next 2 years.
    • Accommodations and compensatory may be developed ANYTIME, underlying motor skills and cognitive skills of attention can improve with structured interventions even years after injury.
    • Diaschisis is the name for the mechanism which explains that undamaged areas don't function. The reason for the dysfunction is that these undamaged areas are deprived of neuronal input from and to the damaged area(s). Diaschisis may explain fastest recovery in early stages during which these undamaged areas reconnect and start to function.
  2. Injury Extent and Severity:
    • Severe injuries takes longer to recover than mild injuries.
    • A focal injury (in one location) recovers more rapidly than a diffuse injury (throughout the brain). However, a small focal lesion can have a significant and long-term negative impact, if the lesion affects a critical brain area where compensation is difficult.
    • Small lesions can recover function and usually recovery of the original behavior.
    • Large lesions develop original behavior through compensation and behavioral adaptation to function.
    • A prior injury can exacerbate a current injury.
  3. Recovery of Different Functions at Different Rates:
    • Simple, highly familiar, over-learned tasks recovery faster. Complex, novel tasks recover slower.
    • Complex tasks involves multiple underlying and interconnected skills and more conscious and flexible control.
    • Functions of the frontal lobe involve effortful attention, flexible planning, organizing, and problem solving. These functions are often among the most persistent impairments after injury.
    • Wernicke's and Broca's aphasias show gradual but incomplete recovery. Recovery from global aphasia is less.
    • Recovery from aphasia after TBI often shows quick and dramatic recovery.

Psychological Factors:

  1. Positive Factors
    • The rehabilitation process involves an interactive partnership-a cooperative process between the patient, family, and therapist.
    • The entire process is grounded in respect, trust, and commitment.
    • The level of readiness of the patient and family contribute to success.
    • The success of intervention is closely related to the working relationship of the therapist and patient's family.
    • The development of therapeutic rapport is essential.
  2. Negative Factors:
    • Effects of the injury
    • Premorbid personality features of patient, family, and/or therapist
    • Problems in negotiating the therapeutic relationship and treatment plan.
    • Depression and anxiety are common on TBI and often result from the cognitive impairment. Depression and anxiety further erode cognitive efficiency and can decrease motivation, contribute to hopelessness, despair, and isolation. In the long run, these negative emotions have a high potential to limit personal and social adjustment and community reintegration.
    • The patient is not aware of his/her own deficits. Therefore, he/she does not recognized the need for treatment and may be resistant to rehabilitation.
    • The aware patient can be resistant to the rehabilitation process due to his/her conception of rehabilitation as being coercive and/or manipulative.
    • Anger, resistance, and refusals decrease success. In early stages after injury, behaviorally based interventions can contribute to making the patient ready for the rehabilitation process.

Neuroplasticity and Synaptic Reorganization:

  1. The brain is fundamentally altered in structure and function by experience.
  2. Diaschisis refers to remote non-damaged areas that reconnect to other non-damaged areas and regain function.
  3. Functional reorganization is a process by which neural circuits that survive after injury reorganize to accomplish a given behavior in a different way. This compensation process can inhibit restitution of function.
  4. Modification of synaptic connectivity occurs when a person is learning and having experiences.
    • This process occurs in adult brains with and without injury.
    • A neuron that has lost input from a damaged area can develop new dendrites or dendritic spines to receive information from undamaged neuron; and to a lesser extent can produce axonal sprouting.
    • This synaptic plasticity is present on both recovery processes and in normal leaning.
    • The variations of rehabilitation experiences affect the kind and degree of input to damaged circuitry and therefore influence recovery.
    • During restitution, neurons reconnect at the injury site. During compensation, neurons reconnect in different or remote circuits.
  5. Influences on Neural Circuitry
    • Structured sensory input can increase connectivity of partially disconnected neural circuits for a desired behavior.
    • Reducing sensory input can decrease connectivity of neural circuits for undesired behavior.
    • In rehabilitation, structured activities are designed to foster reconnectivity of partially disconnected neural circuitry.
  6. The Impact of Interhemispheric Competition
    • The right and left hemispheres of the brain are competitive and serve as inhibitory influences on each other. (Keep each other in line.)
    • After damage to one hemisphere, the inhibitory influence of the damaged hemisphere on the undamaged hemisphere is reduced or lost. (The undamaged hemisphere can get out of line.)
    • The damaged circuits can have further loss of function due to inhibitory competition from the undamaged hemisphere and thereby reduce the recovery potential of the damaged circuits.
    • Recovery of a function involves activating circuits in the damaged hemisphere and reducing activation in the undamaged hemisphere.
    • There may be inhibition operating within the injured hemisphere.
  7. Bottom-Up versus Top-Down Processes in Rehabilitation
    • Bottom-Up processes refer to the provision of perceptual, motor, or other externally generated or cued inputs to the damaged networks. Thereby eventually improving higher functions.
    • Top-Down Processes refer to use of "higher" brain centers to determine what sensory information selected for further processing. Thereby fostering connectivity in the damaged circuits.
    • Efforts to improve attention and executive functions may have extensive positive impact on recovery of a variety of functions.
  8. Neuroplasticity: Future Directions
    • Pharmacological interventions to reduce the biochemical changes (caused by brain injury) that cause further damage to neural networks.
    • Neural implants (cell grafting) that will stimulate growth of cells or cell connections that have been damaged.
    • Stem cells will become more readily available.
    • Gene therapy (gene transfer, gene splicing)
  9. Neuroplasticity: Guiding Principles
    • The brain is a dynamic organ, capable of extensive neurological reorganization over the lifetime of the individual and following injury.
    • Motor, sensory, and cognitive abilities can and usually do improve over time, although recovery is generally prolonged and the sequelae of brain injury usually persist to some degree.
    • Structural changes in the brain, particularly in dendritic fields and synapses, underlie behavioral changes. There are many influences on synaptic connectivity.
    • Enhanced recovery of neurobehavioral function is associated with environmental stimulation and the structuring of experiences in both the normal and damaged brain.
    • There is a role for both restitutive and compensatory approaches in rehabilitation.
    • Functional reorganization typically involves recruitment of areas adjacent to the lesion and in homologous areas of the contralateral hemisphere.
    • Behavioral outcomes reflect a complex interplay of Bottom-Up and Top-Down processes and of intrahemispheric and interhemispheric influences.

Factors Related to Training Programs and Interventions

  1. Recovery is dependent in par on the nature, quality, and quantity of postinjury experiences.
  2. There is inadequate information about whether or not rehabilitation services should be early and intense or less intense but more prolonged time.
  3. These are recommendations are particularly important in early stages of neurological recovery:
    • Make sure the patient is adequately rested. REM sleep may be necessary fir consolidation of learning to take place. Drugs that interfere with sleep may affect cerebral plasticity and may retard recovery.
    • Be cautionary in choosing pharmacological interventions. Some commonly used drugs reduce the potential for plastic changes to the brain. (Diazepam has been shown to impair plastic recovery.) The use of drugs that reduce the potential for plastic changes to the brain should be minimized during rehabilitation.
    • Make use of natural windows of increased arousal and responsiveness. Patients respond best when they are alert and able to attend to the task at hand. Brief, intermittent periods of intervention are likely to be more effective when patients are inconsistently aroused.
    • Monitor and control the attentional load on the patient. Overstimulation can lead to decreased information processing and reduced awareness of errors. Gradually and systematically increase attentional load. Provide structured, systematic stimulation in a hierarchal manner.
    • Develop effective cues starting with verbal, tactile, or visual moving to more subtle and partial cues.
    • Distributed practice for short periods is likely to be more effective than massed practice in a single session. This is consistent with learning theory and clinical observations.
  4. Recommendations for when the patient is better able to participate actively in the rehabilitation process:
    • Use shaping and behavioral chaining strategies based on learning principles.
    • Emphasize modifying antecedents and consequences in behaviorally oriented training. This technique is particularly relevant to brain injured patients.
    • TBI patients are ineffective learners. Identify the nature of the patient's leaning and memory deficit and use teaching strategies that are effective for the individual. Errorless learning reduces errors in the acquisition phase of learning and improves memory.
    • Success breeds success, as well as self-esteem and satisfaction. Maximize the likelihood of a correct response. Focus attention to correct responses.
    • Work for speed and efficiency of processing and responding with minimizing error rates.
    • Use mental rehearsal and attentional focus to provide more top-down control. Over self-talk can be used for self-regulation.
    • Identify which deficits do and do not respond to stimulation based treatments. Attentional skills often respond to repetition and practice. Episodic memory is less likely to improve with explicit practice and is managed better with compensatory approaches.
    • Utilize effective generalization strategies in order for the patient to demonstrate improvements in daily life in a variety of settings.

Source: Sohlberg, M, and Mateer, C. (2001) Cognitive Rehabilitation. NY: The Guilford Press.

 

Return to the Brain Injury Rehabilitation Services Menu


 Services | Resources | Background | Referrals | Contact | Home

Copyright © 2001-2024 Sylvia Whitmire, LCMHC, BCB-Fellow, CCMC. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer: The information posted on this web site is not medical advice and should not be taken as medical advice. Information posted on this web site is for information purposes only. To obtain medical advice, please consult with your physician or schedule an appointment where a complete, detailed history of your specific case may be obtained.